I remember a time , long ago, when there was a lot of moderation of other people’s words, deferentially , apparently in some reference to Osho’s work, which was nothing of the sort , in my view, arguably.
People were told that the sharing of growthful or grown-up words or even ‘ideas’ via time delayed ‘approval’ meant that there was some sort of ‘vitality’ or ‘legacy’, happening. Comments though WERE made that not everyone should have been subjected to, BUT that had not much to do with Osho, and typing them did, then, actually became benign and non-transformational, although I don’t speak from any personal experience.
These permitted words and joined-up writing were let through as ‘ proper engagement ‘. However it seems that in some form of twisted Irish logic, Osho’s legacy had been broken, and these allowed words were not a ‘cutting the edge off ‘ ‘panacea’ for ‘with limits’ opinions; which in any case , shortly after they had been read were completely forgotten anyway and had no long lasting encouragement.
Some words may have ended up being read in Kilburn or Camden , although I don’t know.
Osho even said that if he had been moderated he would have avoided talking and just folded his umbrella, as an old Hindu Bollywood trick would have it and carried on Singing in the Rain deftly and with a lightness of being.
Here is an approved CD album cover photo of how I see things developing in future with a picture of what things could be like, after some tea and cakes.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/14767_344756165639527_2109443731_n.jpg
What do SN punters think of this particular punt, even if it is seen with rear view , hindsight ?
Oshopirates 
